Liberty Forged

the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own. ` Nock

Posts Tagged ‘natural rights’

Until the philosophy is discredited and abandoned

Posted by Jesse on March 13, 2009

Posted in Mine | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Market anarchy – It’s only natural. Embrace life, don’t fight it.

Posted by Jesse on February 11, 2009

Market anarchy is Practical Anarchy:

Although improbable, it is not completely impossible that you might find something radical, thrilling and new in this book – despite its cover price. The best way to spread new ideas is to make them as available and accessible as possible, which is why I give everything away, and rely – not without reason – on the generosity of my readers and listeners.

Nonviolence, Voluntarism, and the end of war:


Posted in anarcho capitalism, anarchy, books, collectivism, culture, economics, free market, government, humor, international, Libertarian, life, minarchist, personal, philosophy, Politics, Rights, thoughts, Video, work, writing | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

HA! Libertarians for Obama.

Posted by Jesse on October 23, 2008

Yeah, like I’d Pay $42 for a thirteen oz. sign with that slogan on it. I’ll take one for free?! A little target practice in the back yard never hurts. Well, the purse might take a hit when Barack takes Chris Rock’s advice and raises the price of bullets. All the more reason to make your own and buy now!!

Libertarians for Obama….Freedom Fighters for Bush….Troops for McCain…

There is nothing new under the Sun. There is only the struggle which persists despite the 08 election and its theme which focuses on the idea of changing the state of things. Translation: “change” is a projection of the state’s intentions; the state of things will be changed/stabilized through and by the command of the state.

Thomas Paine, The Rights of Man (1792):

Great part of that order which reigns among mankind is not the effect of government. It has its origin in the principles of society and the natural constitution of man. It existed prior to government, and would exist if the formality of government was abolished. The mutual dependence and reciprocal interest which man has upon man, and all the parts of civilised community upon each other, create that great chain of connection which holds it together. The landholder, the farmer, the manufacturer, the merchant, the tradesman, and every occupation, prospers by the aid which each receives from the other, and from the whole. Common interest regulates their concerns, and forms their law; and the laws which common usage ordains, have a greater influence than the laws of government. In fine, society performs for itself almost everything which is ascribed to government.

Posted in antiwar, Constitution, economy, Education, free market, Politics, Rights | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Discrimination. Complimentary or Durogatory?

Posted by Jesse on May 22, 2008

So I’ve been commenting on politicalcartel.com, another wordpress blog managed by several persons whom I think are all affiliated with Harding University. I spend time making comments there due to the fact that they have good posts, appear to take the issues seriously, and remain professional in the process.

But I think I’ve been a bit of nuisance, in that I don’t give up too easily and make multiple posts at times. As Walter Block says, libertarians are crazy and rabid about the non aggression axiom and are obnoxiously persistent in adhereing to the principles set forth. Otherwise, what’s the point?

The reason I bring this up now is because David Manes wrote a post about ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act) and asked why people would oppose this legislation. Manes did cite a few reasons that are oft given in opposition but I found them to be quite insufficient. I think, so far, I am the only one who attempted to give some insight from another perspective.

David begins the blog post: “The Employment Non-Discrimination Act is one of those pieces of law with such a great name that you wonder how anyone could ever have a problem with it”
With a lead-off sentence like this, one can imagine how intrigued I was to state a case for discrimination, or more specifically, the decriminalization of discrimination.

One argument made against the legislation that Manes reproduces in his post is:
“ENDA gives special privileges to homosexuals.”
Now, I can see how people arrive at this idea. Basically, what rights could any group have if all people are created as equal? Only individuals have rights, not groups. That should be obvious to anyone. Hence, it is easy to deduce that this legislation must “give” special priveleges to those of a different sexual orientation.

Manes takes the position that the law doesn’t actually “give” anyone anything and it is only protecting people from discrimination. He posits that this is a defense from those who seek to harm people and therefore is a “negative right.” He concludes: “It would be nice if businesses would solve this problem for themselves, but once again, it appears that the only way we can guarantee protection from sexual orientation discrimination is by passing federal legislation.”

Of course, Manes is not upholding the right to freedom of association and the right to private property when advocating such policies. As a business owner it should be my choice about whom to hire or fire. It really is that simple. If a contract is at issue here, then the situation becomes a little more complicated. Discrimination is a matter of judgement. Whether good or bad judgement, in so far as no property rights have been violated, there is no crime. Discrimination on the basis of color, ethnicity, or gender is a vice, it does not make one a criminal.

Manes has stated that: “I believe that we can only solve some problems as a society through the mechanism of government.”

So essentially he and I resemble the tension that exists between individual and collective rights.
I am of the ilk that claims collectivism is slavery. Logic tells me that collective rights are contradictory and only serve to perpetuate issues like racism and other civil rights issues.

———————————–
Reference:

Walter Block, “Discrimination: An Interdisciplinary AnalysisThe Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 11, 1992, pp. 241-254
[mp3] Walter Block, “A Libertarian Analysis of Law“, Cumberland School of Law, Birmingham, Alabama; January 9, 2008
Lew Rockwell, “The Economics of DiscriminationGeorgia State University School of Law in Atlanta, April 1994

Posted in Current Events, Education, free market, Politics, Rights | Tagged: , , , , , | 6 Comments »